Judge In Charlie Kirk Case Denies Key Request from Family
Preliminary hearings for Tyler Robinson, the man accused of assassinating TPUSA founder and conservative youth activist Charlie Kirk 10 months ago, are proceeding this week.
And already, there have been a number of key rulings from Judge Tony Graf Jr
On Wednesday, Graf denied a family request to show all exhibits, including what the state would consider a “confession” from Lance Twiggs, Robinson’s romantic partner (video below). Meanwhile, a Utah investigator testified Tuesday that DNA belonging to Twiggs was found on key pieces of evidence recovered after the Sept. 10, 2025, assassination at Utah Valley University.
According to Faumina, investigators identified male DNA belonging to Twiggs on two significant items recovered during the investigation
The testimony came during the second day of Robinson’s preliminary hearing in Provo as prosecutors continued presenting evidence supporting charges that Robinson fatally shot Kirk during a campus event. Jennifer Faumina, a sergeant with the Utah Department of Public Safety who was assigned to the State Bureau of Investigation at the time of the shooting, read portions of a DNA analysis from the witness stand.
“Male DNA was obtained from item 7-1. Item 7-1 was interpreted as originating from two individuals, one of whom is Twiggs,” Faumina testified
She later added, “Male DNA was obtained from item eight sub one. Item eight sub one was interpreted as originating from two individuals, one of whom is Twiggs.” Those items were identified in court as a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop of the Losee Center for Student Success and a towel that had been wrapped around the rifle allegedly used in the shooting.
Last week, the Utah Supreme Court cleared the way for Robinson’s preliminary hearing to proceed as scheduled
The hearing began Monday morning and is expected to continue throughout the week. The state’s highest court declined to hear the defense’s appeal of two pretrial rulings by Judge Tony Graf, who is overseeing the case.
“This matter is before the court upon a petition for permission to appeal from an interlocutory order,” the order stated
The appeal challenged the judge’s decisions allowing cameras in the courtroom and permitting certain hearsay evidence to be considered during the preliminary hearing, the Post Millennial reported. “The petition for permission to appeal from an interlocutory order is denied. The motion to stay is deemed moot,” the state’s highest court noted further.
The question of allowing cameras in the courtroom has been a recurring issue throughout the pretrial proceedings
Defense attorneys first sought appellate review of Graf’s rulings in May, after he denied their request for a blanket prohibition on cameras during the case. The defense also asked Graf to postpone the preliminary hearing until the Utah Supreme Court decided whether it would hear the appeal, but that request was denied.
In its filing with the state’s high court, the defense again sought to delay the hearing pending the appeal, the PM noted further
In an earlier ruling, Graf determined that requests for electronic media coverage would be evaluated on a hearing-by-hearing basis rather than through a blanket policy. Under his order, news organizations must submit requests to use cameras or other electronic equipment at least 14 days before a scheduled proceeding, while either party may ask the court to restrict or prohibit such coverage. Graf retains final authority over those decisions, said the outlet.
Following the procedures established in the judge’s earlier ruling, the defense sought to bar cameras from covering the preliminary hearing
Graf rejected nearly all of the defense’s requests. The judge granted only one motion, ruling that a media outlet that filed its request to take still photographs during the opening day of the hearing would not be permitted to do so because the application was submitted one day after the court’s filing deadline, noted the Post Millennial.
