Mike Waltz strongly rejected claims that potential U.S. strikes on Iranian infrastructure would amount to war crimes, defending the legality of such actions under the laws of armed conflict. Speaking on Meet the Press, Waltz criticized Democratic lawmakers, segments of the media, and international critics, calling their accusations “irresponsible.”
He argued that certain infrastructure in Iran—including power plants and bridges—can be considered legitimate military targets if they are used to transport weapons or support military operations. According to Waltz, these facilities play a direct role in sustaining Iran’s war capabilities.
Waltz also accused the Iranian government of deliberately blurring the line between civilian and military assets by storing weapons and equipment in residential areas, schools, and hospitals. He claimed such actions violate international law and could themselves constitute war crimes.
Overall, Waltz maintained that U.S. actions would comply with established legal standards while placing responsibility on Iran for endangering civilians.
